It is Open Access week, and I am excited to learn about this aspect of librarianship especially because it is related to e-science, one of my major interests. Open Access is defined as free
access to scholarly articles and journals through the internet. For open access week, Bird library at Syracuse University hosted a discussion by Oya Rieger, the associate librarian at Cornell University library closely involved with arXiv, one of the major open access scholarship repositories. Before this talk, I will admit, I did not what arXiv was and had very little knowledge about open access repositories. Dr. Rieger is very knowledge about e-scholarship and open access, especially as it relates to arXiv. Cornell began hosting arXiv in 2001. Her discussion involved a general overview of arXiv, the successes, new initiatives and the problems the repository was facing. She continued to stress her talk was just the tip of the ice-berg on the vast subject of open access repositories. I am not going to summarize the entire discussion, but rather list several points which stood out to me:
arXiv is an open access repository for
scholarship. Dr. Reiger feels arXiv complements rather than
competes with commercial scholarly publishers.
- arXiv adopted a sustainability initiative
The major problem was many users were taking arXiv
for granted and unaware of the financial problems. There was no
long term planning and the heads of arXiv did not want to continue to solely
rely on Cornell University for financial support
Because it is heavily used and relied upon scholars
all over the world, it was imperative for arXiv to develop and adopt
self-sustaining initiatives and policies
They developed a business plan which will support the
creation of infrastructure, and sustain growth and arXiv in the future.
arXiv reviewed whom was using their
repository and asked major users/ institutions to voluntarily contribute funds
to maintain and support the continuing development of arXiv. For
the most part, they received the support they requested.
The sustainability initiative includes reviewing and
stabilizing organizational planning
Arxiv’s success is due to social support and not only
its technological infrastructure. In fact, arXiv’s infrastructure
is extremely old and invisible to users, it is simply background taken for
granted. It only becomes visible when it fails, hence the need to
develop sustainable long term policies and support.
Articles submitted to arXiv are not
peer reviewed, but rather screened by arXiv moderates. Submitting to arXiv is
self-motivated and done by scholars to receive feedback and/or promote their
work. Peer review journals are competitive and it
can take several years of review before an article is published. ArXiv attempts
to quicken the process.
Although it is perceived to be largely a physics
database, it provides scholarly articles in mathematics, non-linear sciences,
computer science, quantitative finance, quantitative biology, and statistics as
ArXiv believes in transparency and its financial plan
is available on its website.
I wonder how open access will evolve and impact me as a special librarian in the future, especially as sustainability measures are developed? Additionally, if arXiv’s self-sustaining measures are
successful how will this impact other open access repositories and e-scholarship as a whole? It is exciting to see, and I hope Dr. Reiger will visit again next year!
Dr. Rieger’s profile on the Cornell website: http://vivo.cornell.edu/display/individual23129#background
ArXiv’s website: http://arxiv.org/
Wikipedia Entry on Open Access: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access